Cases 21 - 30 of 2,962
Smith v. Transphorm, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Tara Smith
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc, Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
HUMPHREY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03929
Plaintiff:
JULIE HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ortiz v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Cindy Ortiz
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of, Henry Topps, Joshua Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McKinney v. Parker et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Bianca McKinney
Defendant:
Westbrook J. Parker and Robert J. Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Williams et al v. Humphreys County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Cordney Williams and David James
Defendant:
Humphreys County Sheriff's Department, Humphreys County Board of Supervisors and Humphreys County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Humphrey v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
DION KIRK HUMPHREY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
