Cases 21 - 30 of 9,749
COWDIN III v. BASF CORPORATION et al
as 3:2023cv24639
Plaintiff:
EDWIN G. COWDIN III
Defendant:
BASF CATALYSTS LLC, BASF CORPORATION, BELL TEXTRON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Oswald et al v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2023cv01074
Defendant:
Domco Products Texas, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Cross Defendant:
Redco Corp, Judith Oswald, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodrich Corporation, H.M. Royal, Inc. and IMO Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Oswald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Love et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Love and Karen L. Morey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Robinson Insulation Company, Grogan Robinson Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00825
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dean, Sr. et al v. AII Acquisition LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01467
Defendant:
AII Acquisition LLC, Flowserve Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA and others
Plaintiff:
Nile Dean, Sr. and Camellia Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Pitcher et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09813
Cross Defendant:
John Pitcher, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Pitcher
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Barretts Minerals Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Block Drug Company, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05012
Plaintiff:
Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Redco Corporation, Velan Valve Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff:
Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
