Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jackson v. Sullivan
as 1:2026cv06382
Defendant: Mr. Warden Sullivan
Plaintiff: Ike Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv08271
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv08273
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv08255
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
IK Multimedia US LLC v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv04104
Plaintiff: IK Multimedia US LLC
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv03123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5984
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights › Jobs
Ike v. State of Md et al
as 1:2026cv03453
Petitioner: Justice Ike
Respondent: State of Md and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Katie al-Janaby v. Brandon Alexander
as 26-2183
Plaintiff: KATIE AL-JANABY, individually, ABDUL AL-JANABY, individually, TINA WILLEY, individually and others
Defendant: BRANDON ALEXANDER and SHAE DENNISTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv10501
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: IK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., IK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION doing business as AMANTEL and AMANTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?