Cases 41 - 50 of 4,303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez v. Causey
as 24-60080
Plaintiff:
Gabino Ramos Hernandez
Defendant:
Phillip Causey, John Doe, An Unknown Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officer and United States of America
Casilla Rosario v. Searls
as 24-379
Petitioner:
ROBERT CASILLA ROSARIO
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
PORTO CARRERO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
WALBERTO SANCHEZ PORTO CARRERO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shalon Grode v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 8:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shalon Grode
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
I.J. v. Harper et al
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
I. J.
Defendant:
Mellissa B. Harper, Scott Ladwig, Robert Ainley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1119
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
