Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Great American E and S Insurance Company v. Lotus Innovations, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv01174
Defendant:
Lotus Innovations Management, LLC, Lotus Innovations, LLC, Lotus Innovations Fund, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Great American E&S Insurance Company and Great American E and S Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Johnson v. Sphinx Development Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03159
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Sphinx Development Corporation, Jay Oji, Jackie Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Innovative Management Group, LLC et al v. Bennett et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Innovative Management Group, LLC , Cash Zone, LLC , Money 4 You, LLC and others
Defendant:
Jerry L. Bennett and Jason Schierberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens v. Innovative Management Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Margaret Owens
Defendant:
Innovative Management Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Komada, LLC v. American Innovative Management, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Komada, LLC and Komada, LLC
Defendant:
American Innovative Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
