Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Business Realty Investment Com v. Jefferson County, Alabama, et al
as 13-13612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BUSINESS REALTY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA and INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Enright v. Insituform Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sheila M. Enright
Defendant:
Insituform Technologies, Inc., Corrpro Companies, Inc. and John Howard Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Insituform Technologies, Inc.
as 0:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Gary Reed , Tom Vevea , James Brady and others
Defendant:
Insituform Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Insituform Technologies Inc v. Major Constructors LLC
as 4:2009cv01478
Plaintiff:
Insituform Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Major Constructors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ellis v. Insituform Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Terry T. Ellis
Defendant:
Insituform Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Doe
as 4:2009mc00142
Plaintiff:
Insituform Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Reynolds Inliner LLC v. Insituform Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02319
Plaintiff:
Reynolds Inliner LLC, Reynolds Inliner LLC and Reynolds Inliner LLC
Defendant:
Insituform Technologies, Inc. and Insituform (Netherlands), B.V., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Schnepp
as 4:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Insituform Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
William J. Schnepp
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Compan
as 08-1603
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
