Cases 41 - 50 of 8,940
(PC) Erakat v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Erakat
Defendant:
Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service, Ogden, Utaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosenthal v. United States of America et al
as 9:2024cv80354
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Rosenthal
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Internal Revenue Service and Commissioner of the United States Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Conmac Investments, Inc. v. CIR
as 24-1605
Petitioner:
Conmac Investments, Inc.
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Mawule Tepe v. IRS, et al
as 24-5261
Plaintiff:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Turner v. Alamia et al
as 1:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
James Alamia, Chris Janish, Legal Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
CALVARY TABERNACLE CHURCH v. UNION PLANTERS BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
CALVARY TABERNACLE CHURCH
Defendant:
UNION PLANTERS BANK, N.A., INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, SHEET METAL MODELS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Nguyen, et al v. CIR
as 24-9002
Petitioner:
DZUY NGUYEN and JESSICA THAI
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
