Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Travis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Datrin Travis
Defendant:
Sarah-Ann Williams, Chief T. Conrad, A. Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMEON J. BRIGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Director of RIDOC, LINDA AMADO, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Administrator of Classification Service and others
Briggs v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Simeon J. Briggs
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Patricia Coyne-Fague, Linda Amado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BASKIN v. LEAVINS
as 3:2021cv00699
Defendant:
AARON LEAVINS, B PINEDAS, M BANTIQUE and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKIN v. CLEMMONS
as 3:2021cv00701
Defendant:
W CLEMMONS, ALFORD, B PINEDAS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintana v. Briggs et al
as 1:2020cv02784
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Quintana
Defendant:
J. Briggs and Steve Reams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Ebbert
as 1:2018cv00563
Petitioner:
Simeon J. Briggs
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Briggs v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv01543
Petitioner:
Simeon J. Briggs
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quarles v. Briggs
as 5:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kristina Quarles
Defendant:
J Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reno Rios v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 14-15817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENO FUENTES RIOS
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, Warden of CSP-Corcoran-SHU, WAYNE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, E. CLARK, M.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
