Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Gregg-Wilson v. Sumter County, S.C. et al
as 3:2019cv00987
Defendant:
Bryan Keith Griffin, Sumter County Sheriff Department, Sumter County, S.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P.L. Gregg-Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abrams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11573
Plaintiff:
Gary G. Elder, Chris Bilotti, Hector Rivera and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Warden Cothran, J Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2017cv02996
Defendant:
J Dean, District Attorney Office, N Doble and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
US v. Christopher Dean
as 17-4372
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DEANS
Orcutt v. Deane et al
as 4:2017cv40017
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Orcutt
Defendant:
James J Deane and Gorham Truck Repair and Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorothy Johnson, et al v. Memphis Light Gas & Water Div., et al
as 16-6143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY MAE JOHNSON, surviving spouse and LOIS TOWNES, as Next of Kin to J. Dean Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS & WATER DIVISION
Burnette et al v. House et al
as 1:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
James C Burnette and James S Burnette
Defendant:
Brian Macon House , Mary Jane P Melton and Jeffrey J Dean
Counter_claimant:
Mary Jane P Melton
Counter_defendant:
James S Burnette and James C Burnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. IRS
as 1:2016cv00663
Plaintiff:
Melvin J. Dean
Defendant:
IRS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
