Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Interlachen Lumber, LLC et al v. Brunswick Valley Lumber, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00873
Plaintiff:
Interlachen Lumber, LLC and Michael J. Haas
Defendant:
Brunswick Valley Lumber, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv00794
Plaintiff:
Kyle J Haas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kim v.Grand Valley State University et al
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
GwanJun Kim
Defendant:
Grand Valley State University , Thomas J. Haas , Grand Valley State University, College of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Haas v. Warden SCI Somerset, et al
as 11-1395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD J. HAAS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN SCI SOMERSET, ATTY GEN PA and DA CHESTER CTY
OSMAR v. NICHOLS
as 3:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
ABAD OSMAR
Defendant:
MARSHA NICHOLS, J HAAS and W D RUMMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOINS v. MCNEIL
as 3:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C GOINS
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, MICHAEL TIDWELL, M MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pablo Bauer v. Nichols, et al
as 10-15540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO BAUER
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLS, ARNP, KWAME ASANTE, MD CHO and J. HAAS, AWP Asst Warden
Jimenez v. Codama et al
as 2:2010cv02381
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Unknown Codama, Comcare, ValueOptions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haas v. The State of Colorado, et al
as 10-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J. HAAS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
HAAS v. WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2010cv00183
Petitioner:
GERALD J. HAAS
Respondent:
WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
