Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Potter v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2026cv00120
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Potter
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Peery v. Potter
as 3:2026cv01284
Plaintiff:
Scott D Peery
Defendant:
Andrew Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Potter v. State of Washington
as 2:2026cv00402
Petitioner:
Dalton Scott Potter
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Harden et al
as 2:2026cv02498
Plaintiff:
Gregg Marcellus Harden
Defendant:
Sheriff James F. Potter and Captain Kevin M. Filipowicz
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Bass v. Gentile et al
as 2:2026cv02774
Plaintiff:
Jacquline Bass
Defendant:
Denise Gentile, Cynthia Steele, William Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Potter v. State of Washington
as 2:2026cv00383
Petitioner:
Dalton Scott Potter
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Texarkana Arkansas Police Department et al
as 4:2026cv04067
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Texarkana Arkansas Police Department, McJunckins, Wayne Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chorney Bass v. Gentile et al
as 2:2026cv02759
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Chorney Bass
Defendant:
Denise Gentile, Cynthia Steele, William Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Potter v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia
as 2:2026cv00534
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Potter
Defendant:
Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
