Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Caplan v. Auguste et al
as 0:2024cv60613
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Curtis J. Auguste an Individual doing business as Curt's Auto Body Repair and Quentin Gomez Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
TAYLOR et al v. SHIVELY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW TAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE C. SHIVELY, ROBERT PIGMAN, MARY MARGARET LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
CLARK v. MALIK et al
as 3:2023cv03697
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY S. CLARK
Defendant:
MUDBUSER MALIK, TERESA MAYER, KEVIN O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUGUST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv21609
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEANELL J AUGUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
August et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv11224
Plaintiff:
Tracy J August , Melissa Memmer and April Hutchison
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections , Anthony Stewart and Heidi E Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edna Arceneaux, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90081
Plaintiff - Respondent:
EDNA ARCENEAUX, THOPHILUS ATKINSON, ALEXANDREA AUGUST and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Arceneaux et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00724
Plaintiff:
Edna Arceneaux , Theophilus Atkinson , Alexandrea August and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall J August v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01875
Plaintiff:
Marshall J August
Defendant:
Does and Target Corporation
In re: Steven J.A. August
as 11-80115
Respondent:
In re: STEVEN J. AUGUST, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: December 18, 2002,
August v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Debra J. August
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
