Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Mosby v. Flynn et al
as 3:2016cv01019
Plaintiff:
Maurice Mosby
Defendant:
D. Flynn, Walker, Alfred Joshua, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J. Doe 1 et al v. Avid Life Media, Inc., et al
as 4:2015cv01879
Defendant:
Avid Life Media, Inc. and Avid Dating Life, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J. Doe 1 , J. Doe 2 , J. Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: ASHLEY MADISON CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 4:2015md02669
Plaintiff:
John Does 1-21, David Miller, Nhung Truong and others
Defendant:
Avid Dating Life, Inc., Noel Biderman, Barnes & Thornburg LLP and others
Petitioner:
Amicus Doe 1, Amicus Doe 3, Amicus Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
J. Doe 1 et al v. Avid Life Media, Inc., et al
as 8:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Avid Dating Life, Inc., and Avid Life Media, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
J. Doe 1, J. Doe 2, J. Doe 3 and others
ERICKSEN v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2015cv10088
Plaintiff:
Daniel ERICKSEN
Defendant:
J. Doe #1, Officer Repic, J. Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RETZLER v. LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2014cv04718
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY A. RETZLER
Defendant:
DENNIS LEIGHTON, JAMES P. MCANDREW, KEVIN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LordMaster v. Sussex II State Prison
as 1:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Frankie Jae LordMaster
Defendant:
Sussex II State Prison, Warden Vargo, J. Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Micklas v. Phillips et al
as 0:2014cv60952
Plaintiff:
Ronald Micklas
Defendant:
Carol-Lisa Phillips, Lisa White, J. Robert Miertschin, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ronald Micklas v. Carol-Lisa Phillips, et al
as 12-15063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MICKLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROL LISA PHILLIPS, LISA WHITE, J. ROBERT MIERTSCHIN, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
