Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Jones v. Rubaroc USA et al
as 1:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Jones
Defendant:
Rubaroc USA, Rubaroc Inc, Vulcan Surfacing Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Acosta et al v. Vilsack et al
as 5:2021cv04045
Plaintiff:
Claudette M. Acosta, Joann M Sawvell, Sanjuanita Gomez Palacio and others
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, Justin Maxson, Chad Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Rubaroc USA et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Jones
Defendant:
Rubaroc USA, Rubaroc Inc, Vulcan Surfacing Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Masseth et al v. Willie J. Jones III et al
as 5:2021cv01408
Defendant:
The Snowline JUSD Board of Trustees, Willie J Jones, III, Snowline Joint Unified School District and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Masseth and Holly Masseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cohen v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Russel Burger, Gabriel Russell, Andrew Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Nate Cohen and Nathan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant:
BOBBI J. SALAMON, HUNT, PROBURSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
