Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ruff v. Warden T. Wallace
as 9:2023cv02854
Petitioner:
Eddie Ruff and Eddie J Ruff,
Respondent:
Warden T. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. The City of Roswell Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Donte Leon Hale
Defendant:
The City of Roswell Police Department, Officer C.T. Jackson, J. Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Brackbill v. Stephen Ruff, et al
as 22-1628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN E. BRACKBILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN J. RUFF, GREGORY A. HILL, IAN L. DAWSON and others
Andrew Fields, III v. BOP, et al
as 22-15497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS III
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, VON B. BLANCKENSEE, Warden, SEGAL, Warden and others
Hopes v. Ruff et al
as 4:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Jeremy Ulrich, T Schneider, J Ruff and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Hopes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2020cv00557
Defendant:
Unknown Ceniceros, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Mierzejew and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Forrest v. Gallion et al
as 4:2020cv00302
Defendant:
R Carvajal, K Lagro, T Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Patrick Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00562
Defendant:
M Vasquez, Unknown Wade, K Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Hank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bells v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00561
Defendant:
M Vasquez, Unknown Wade, K Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bells et al v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00538
Defendant:
M Vasquez, Unknown Wade, K Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr. and Gary Hank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
