Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Garcia v. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Defendant:
Warden, Nurse Angela Hannah, PA-C Joe Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sibrian Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv08545
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Seeba v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02159
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Seeba
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt v. Seeba et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
James Hunt
Defendant:
Jason Seeba, USP Lewisburg, David J. Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moneyham v. United States et al
as 3:2017cv01798
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Defendant:
United States, Bidelspach, Seeba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Matt Jackson et al v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2016cv08963
Plaintiff:
Peter Aguilar, Marco A. Arredondo, Adam Berger and others
Defendant:
City of West Covina and Does
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
