Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Webb v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 1:2015cv02766
Plaintiff:
Clifton J Webb, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Allendale, County of, Charles Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Dart
as 1:2014cv08954
Plaintiff:
Willie J Webb
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGary v. Boyle et al
as 7:2014cv00108
Defendant:
JC Boyle, Major J Webb and T Metzger
Plaintiff:
Jarrard McGary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00881
Defendant:
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP DISABILITY PLAN and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
NICOLE J WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Webb v. Moreland et al
as 6:2014cv06037
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Webb
Defendant:
Moreland, King, Hisek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Dallas Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Matthew K McBride
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department, J Webb and NFN Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. International Scaffold Erectors, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08169
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
International Scaffold Erectors, Inc. and David J. Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Webb v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12895
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Webb
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Webb v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12895
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Webb
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
