Cases 1 - 10 of 1,343
US v. Michael Harriot
as 24-6181
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Feimann et al v. County of Clinton et al
as 8:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ronald Feimann, Gary Francis Whitney, Jr, Tonia Lehoisky and others
Defendant:
County of Clinton and Kimberly Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feimann et al v. County of Clinton et al
as NYN/8:24-CV-00257
Plaintiff:
Feimann, Ronald Feimann, Gary Francis Whitney, Jr and others
Defendant:
County of Clinton and Kimberly Davis
Thomas (PS) et al v. CDOC
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
LL Cool J, Ice Cube, Jay-Z and others
Defendant:
CDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Richard Smith, III
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith, James Leonard v. United States Of America
as 9:2024cv80194
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Turner et al v. Avco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Veronica Turner and Kevin Turner
Defendant:
Avco Corporation, Textron, Inc., Black Rome LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James SmithIn re: James Smith
as 24-1103
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
