Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Coker v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Coker
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky, Sheriff Todd Shelley, Deputy Chad Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv40031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sizemore v. Hamblen County et al
as 2:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Theresa Laws, William Kelly, Esco Jarnigan and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Coffey
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Kane v. Town of New Ipswich, et al
as 17-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KANE
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW IPSWICH, NH, GEORGE H. LAWRENCE, JOANNE MESHNA and others
Defendant:
GEORGE K. SLYMAN, SR. and JONATHAN SISTARE
Kane v. New Ipswich, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2016cv00123
Defendant:
James Coffey, Jeanne Cunningham, Rebecca Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Second Chance Jai Alai LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher Howard and Jeffrey Greenstone
Defendant:
Second Chance Jai Alai LLC and Joseph James Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Grooms, Jr. v. City of Morristown, Tennessee, et al
as 15-5291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES W. GROOMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MORRISTOWN, TENNESSEE, ROGER OVERHOLT, Chief of Police of the Morristown Police Department, VICKIE ARNOLD, officer of the Morristown Police Department and others
Coffey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
James Coffey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
