Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WEBB et al v. PERKINS
as 7:2026cv00264
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS WEBB and LATASHA LUKE
Defendant:
TONY PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB et al v. PERKINS DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - DOCKET IN CASE NO 7:26-cv-00264-LAG
as 1:2026cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS WEBB and LATASHA LUKE
Defendant:
TONY PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2026cv03646
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Hill
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.), AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Green et al v. Vail Resorts, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03555
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Green, James Douglas and Joseph Goad
Defendant:
Vail Resorts, Inc., Alterra Mountain Company, Boyne USA, Inc., d/b/a Boyne Resorts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bowman et al v. Rauld et al
as 1:2026cv01161
Plaintiff:
Brodie Bowman, Jake Bryant, Brian Chu and others
Defendant:
Mauricio J. Rauld, Premier Law Group, Timothy B. Gertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Lee Boozer v. Lonnie Oliver, et al
as 26-1707
Plaintiff:
LEE BOOZER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER, SANTOS, CO CHRISTOPHER BEERBOWER and others
Nettles v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2026cv02106
Plaintiff:
Milton Wayne Nettles
Defendant:
Martin Gonzalez, John Doe 1-2, Judge Catherine Torres-Stahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Eric Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2026cv00558
Petitioner:
James Douglas Jones
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: James Doby, III
as 26-10597
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES DOUGLAS DOBY, III
Respondent:
DEANDREA TOWNES, WILLIAM BEAVER, ANALISE WALKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
