Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Dyllan Rives, et al v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 24-5336
Plaintiff:
DYLLAN RIVES and JAMES R. RIVES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, DONDE PLOWMAN, Individually and as Chancellor, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE and others
Clayborne v. Basaldua et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bianca Clayborne
Defendant:
Ruben Basaldua, Donnie Clark, Douglas Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenney et al v. Margaret, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Devantae McKenney and Dexter Pickett
Defendant:
City of Margaret, Alabama, Christobal Sanchez, Alfa Insurance Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rives et al v. University of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Dyllan Rives and James R Rives
Defendant:
University of Tennessee, Donde Plowman, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill-Colbert v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hill-Colbert, Vincent Barnao, Jennifer Timmons and others
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department and Tyler Cantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. Pritzker
as 1:2020cv02583
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker and J.B.
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
