Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, L.L.C., Jeffrey T. Titus, James M. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
David Laurence Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Malkowski et al.
as 1:2019cv07211
Defendant:
Medical Technician Bobby, Mary Ellen Grennan, Unknown Health Care Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoeltzel v. Pillsbury et al
as 2:2019cv12328
Defendant:
Tom Cargill, Lucas, Jane Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Franklin Hoeltzel
Hoey v. County of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04470
Defendant:
Lawrence Hale Newman, Audrey S. Moore, Esq., Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hoey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. SAMUAH et al
as 3:2018cv16284
Defendant:
OLIVIA SAMUAH, DOCTOR JOHN MOE TWO, RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsson v. Jung-Oliver et al
as 1:2018cv07084
Defendant:
James Corcaran, Maureen Jung-Oliver, Illinois Inspector General and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. PLOUSIS et al
as 2:2018cv11224
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PERRY
Defendant:
JOHNDOE, LOPEZ, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turney et al v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Philip A Turney, Billy Ray Bartlett, James S Hendrickson and others
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Bragg v. Francis Meo, et al
as 17-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. FRANCIS MEO, MD and NURSES JANE ROES 1-3, At Northern State Prison Medical Department
Hindu-Robles v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2017cv05487
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital, Jane Roe(s), John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Nicholas Hindu-Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
