Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jeffrey Clark v. Brad Cain
as 23-35333
Petitioner / Appellant: JEFFREY MARK CLARK
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN
McMeel v. Serravalli We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05121
Petitioner: Jeffrey Mark McMeel
Respondent: Maggie Serravalli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hicks v. United States of America
as 5:2021hc02107
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Jeffrey Mark Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Cain We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00435
Petitioner: Jeffrey Mark Clark
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seago v. Director , TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00613
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Jeffrey Mark Seago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tomlinson v. De Laurentis et al
as 1:2016cv02674
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Mark Tomlinosn
Defendant: Michael De Laurentis and Sean Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff #226553 v. Abdamu et al
as 2:2015cv02298
Defendant: Unknown Abdamu, Unknown Mor and Unknown Party
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Mark Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Patten v. NC Dept of Public Safety
as 15-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS PATTEN, LESLIE TEACHEY, RYAN TURNER and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, FRANK L. PERRY, LAFAYETTE HALL and others
Patten et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2015ct03118
Plaintiff: Thomas Patten , Leslie Teachey , Ryan Turner and others
Defendant: Frank L. Perry, Lafayette Hall, Jeffrey Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Kennoy v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 15-2296
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY MARK KENNOY
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?