Cases 21 - 30 of 669
Fisher v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lin v. Wray et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, DOJ, Chad Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zelesnik v. McConnell et al
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Greg Lordsman, President Joe Biden and others
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Nissen v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Michael James Nissen
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA, named as Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named Judges of the Superior Court, ANN A. SCOTT TIMMER, Duty Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court and others
Stuckey v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Tommy C. Stuckey, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Al Gore, Jimmy Dean Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
WAYNE C. MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
