Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Dover v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kelly v. Oesch
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rickie Joe Kelly and Rickie Joe Hampton
Defendant:
Amanda Oesch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendy v. Morrison et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Edward Bissau Mendy
Defendant:
James McKenzie Morrison, Kevin Lightburn, Roy Jones, Jr and others
Dover v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 1:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Earl Leiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caston v. University of Houston et al
as 1:2021cv00510
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
University of Houston, Krogers, W. Rodney McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gawel v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01744
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Jim Greely, Jesper Hoiland and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Gawel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winfrey v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00132
Defendant:
John Walker, Brandon Sutton, Joe Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Monterion D Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00128
Defendant:
John Walker, Brandon Sutton, Joe Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Michael K Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00129
Defendant:
John Walker, Brandon Sutton, Joe Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Robert B Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
