Cases 1 - 10 of 735
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
John K Williams
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Ritenour
as 24-50298
Plaintiff:
John Bernard Williams, III
Defendant:
John Joseph Ritenour, Jr. and Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, Consumer Protection Division, Law Enforcement Division, and Civil Rights Division, Hate Crimes
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Respondent:
John F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
CDCR and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen and Raymond L. Aigbekaen
Defendant:
USA, Collette Peters, John F. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Board of Govenors of the Federal Reserve System et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Jerome H Powell and John C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03545
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
