Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Minnesota Living Assistance v. Ken B. Peterson, et al
as 17-2658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Minnesota Living Assistance, Inc., doing business as Baywood Home Care
Defendant - Appellee:
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of Minnesota, in his official capacity and John Aiken, Interim Director of Labor Standards, Department of Labor and Industry, State of Minnesota, in his official capacity
Minnesota Living Assistance, Inc. v. Peterson et al
as 0:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Living Assistance, Inc.
Defendant:
Ken B. Peterson and John Aiken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AIKENS v. HOUSER
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
Brenda Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKENS v. HOUSER
as 2:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
BRENDA HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKENS v. HOUSER
as 1:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
BRENDA HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AT&T Services, Inc. v. Peterson et al
as 0:2014cv04874
Plaintiff:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Ken B. Peterson and John Aiken
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
AIKENS v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv07010
Petitioner:
JOHN AIKENS
Respondent:
DANIEL BURNS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: John Aiken
as 13-2751
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN AIKENS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Aiken et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv04645
Plaintiff:
Shirley Aiken and John Aiken
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AIKENS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv00493
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
