Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Butler v. Kanjorski et al
as 3:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
John Butler
Defendant:
Kelly, Jane Doe, Major Kanjorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin Walker v. John Butler
as 24-7041
Defendant:
JOHN HARDY, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor, JANE BUGGS, Corporal, Classification, NICK GALLAM, Captain and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN REECE WALKER, a/k/a Shayla Walker
BUTLER v. INCH et al
as 3:2024cv00500
Defendant:
CODY MITCHELL, S DOVE, MACCARGAR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Butler v. Pierson, et al
as 24-2871
Defendant:
SERGEANT SAM HEIDER, Deputy Warden, SERGEANT WADE, RYAN SZELEWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Butler v. Morazcka et al
as 3:2024cv01455
Defendant:
MAJOR Jankorski, Banta, Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
John Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuels v. Bynum et al
as 4:2024cv00375
Defendant:
GT Bynum, Kimberly Johnson, Wendell Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Brande Lee Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. MORAZCKA et al
as 2:2024cv04186
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, LT. JOHN DOE, OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Crystal Marie Allen
Defendant:
Krista L. Fleegle, Ritchie County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy L. Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Defendant:
JOHN BUTLER and ELIAS FOSKEY
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
