Cases 1 - 10 of 121
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2025cv00082
Plaintiff:
DAVID D BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Butler v. Kanjorski, et al
as 25-1195
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JANE DOE, works in inmate accounts at SCI-Mahanoy, KANJORSKI, works in inmate accounts at SCI-Mahanoy, KELLY, works in inmate accounts at SCI-Mahanoy and others
Butler v. TTG Imaging Solutions LLC
as 2:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
John Butler
Defendant:
TTG Imaging Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
John Butler v. Mroczka, et al
as 24-3303
Defendant:
DR. MROCZKA, MAJOR JANKORSKI, DEPUTY BANTA and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Butler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2024cv01239
Petitioner:
Jeremiah John Butler
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Kanjorski et al
as 3:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
John Butler
Defendant:
Kelly, Jane Doe, Major Kanjorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin Walker v. John Butler
as 24-7041
Defendant:
JOHN HARDY, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor, JANE BUGGS, Corporal, Classification, NICK GALLAM, Captain and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN REECE WALKER, a/k/a Shayla Walker
BUTLER v. INCH et al
as 3:2024cv00500
Defendant:
CODY MITCHELL, S DOVE, MACCARGAR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Butler v. Pierson, et al
as 24-2871
Defendant:
SERGEANT SAM HEIDER, Deputy Warden, SERGEANT WADE, RYAN SZELEWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Butler v. Morazcka et al
as 3:2024cv01455
Defendant:
MAJOR Jankorski, Banta, Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
John Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
