Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Cochran v. Standard Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv04099
Plaintiff:
John Cochran
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Calhoon v. Cochran et al
as 6:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
E. Calhoon
Defendant:
John Cochran and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cochran v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Cochran
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cochran et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
John Cochran and Amanda Cochran
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Layton v. McLane
as 22-11144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan Joseph Layton, also known as Mary Kathleen Layton, also known as Katie
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha McLane, Director of the Texas Commitment Center, John Cochran, Wayne Schmoker and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 3:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 1:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
