Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Harris et al v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Zhen Lin, Shawn Wilson, Andrew Carrier and others
Defendant:
Bavarian Motor Works and BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Boonses et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv15313
Plaintiff:
Somjit Boonses and John May
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Somjit Boonses et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 8:2018cv01788
Plaintiff:
Somjit Boonses and John May
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rinehart v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2018cv00262
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility, John Mays, Kris Weitzell and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Michael Rinehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. v. May
as 5:2018cv01631
Plaintiff:
Securitas Electronic Security, Inc.
Defendant:
John May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doss v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Doss
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Newton Correctional Facility, Kris Weitzell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Newton Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Jacobs
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility, Frits and John Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. May et al
as 1:2017cv05402
Plaintiff:
Gary D Quinn, II
Defendant:
John May, Allison Beatty, Modi Miteshkumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John May v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv05177
Defendant:
Does, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
John May
May v. Winter Haven Police Department et al.
as 8:2017cv01405
Plaintiff:
John May
Defendant:
Winter Haven Police Department and Checkers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
