Cases 41 - 50 of 374
Bowman et al v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ariel Bowman, Carey Reese and Daryl Culbertson
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Brayden L Leopold, Colin B Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Campbell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Petitioner:
John William Campbell
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John William Argel v. Gavin Newsome et al
as 2:2022cv03344
Plaintiff:
John William Argel
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Adrian Galvan, Christopher S. Macauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Argel v. Ron Godwin, et al
as 22-15203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM ARGEL
Defendant / Appellee:
RON GODWIN, Warden and SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden, warden
Upshaw v. Chau et al
as 3:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
John William Upshaw
Defendant:
Dr. John Chau and Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Engel v. Dr. John Williams, et al
as 22-1235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. John Williams, Corizon and Missouri Department of Corrections
(PC) Brackett v. Wendell et al
as 2:2021cv02282
Plaintiff:
Demond Charles Brackett
Defendant:
Anderson Wendell, Brian Jon Davis, Clint Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cory Dean Runge v. John Muhammad et al
as 2:2021cv09096
Plaintiff:
Cory Dean Runge
Defendant:
John Muhammad, John Costelo and John Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. USA
as 3:2021cv00390
Petitioner:
John William Hanson, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
