Cases 1 - 10 of 2,014
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Hollywood Sikh Temple et al
as 2:2024cv05155
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Hollywood Sikh Temple, Nishapur, Iran, Archbishopric of Reims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3704
Petitioner:
JOSE DAVID HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, EVA SARAI GALO-ROBLES, KEREN NICOLE HERNANDEZ-GALO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
HERNANDEZ ALONSO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06931
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ ALONSO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMSUMER INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC F/K/A LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez v. Gutierrez
as 24-50422
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Chair Person; Pardon & Paroles, Eric J. R. Nichols, Chair Person; Texas Board Department of Criminal Justice, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Hernandez Lara et al v. Las Princesas Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Hernandez Lara, Ismael Lorenzo Perez, Leonel Santiago Gomez and others
Defendant:
Las Princesas Corporation, Martha Zeferino Jose, Tankard Farms LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Hernandez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Hernandez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hernandez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
United States of America v. Rodriguez Tapia
as 24-1245
Defendant:
ALEX SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ TAPIA, NERLYN LUIS BAQUE VILLAFUERTE, JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ LASA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
