Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Corrales et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Jose Corrales, Rosaura Corrales, Heidi Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Anthony Garcia and Does 1-50, inclusive
Guardian Ad Litem:
Amiregh Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
CORRAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15805
Plaintiff:
JOSE CORRAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cardoza v. Myers et al
as 7:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jose Corral Cardoza
Defendant:
James Steven Myers, DOT Family Holdings, LLC and DOT Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Nevarez v. Corral
as 1:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nevarez
Defendant:
Jose Corral doing business as Lakeside Landscapes & Lawn care
Williams v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05867
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Williams
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange and Jose Corrales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Primerica Life Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jose Corral Rodriguez and Haydee Corral Seijas
Defendant:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Corrales Corrales v. Garland
as 21-625
Petitioner:
JOSE CORRALES CORRALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bryan J.C. Loria v. FMC Technologies Surface Integrated Svcs
as 1:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jose Corrales Loria
Defendant:
FMC Technologies Surface Integrated Svcs and FMC Technologies Surface Integrated Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
