Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Joseph Clark, II v. Kevin Staton
as 17-7310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN STATON, TAMMY FENNELL, WILLIE THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
JOHN LAWRENCE and LARRY CALDWELL
Joseph Perry v. Pacific Maritime Industries Co, et al
as 17-55931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH EARL PERRY, ex rel. United States of America
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC MARITIME INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a California corporation, HARCON PRECISION METALS, INC., a California corporation and JOHN ATKINSON, an individual
Joseph Perry v. Pacific Maritime Indus. Corp., et al
as 17-55931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH EARL PERRY, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
PACIFIC MARITIME INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a California corporation, HARCON PRECISION METALS, INC., a California corporation and JOHN ATKINSON, an individual
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. State of Washington
as 2:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Singleton
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meling, Joseph v. Williams II, Louis
as 3:2017cv00053
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Meling
Respondent:
Louis Williams II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BATTLE v. SOMERSET COUNTY PROBATE CLERK
as 1:2017mc00022
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARLE BATTLE
Respondent:
SOMERSET COUNTY PROBATE CLERK
CLARK v. PERRY
as 1:2017cv00047
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmondson et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01944
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edmondson , Larry Barnes , Laura Tockman and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmondson et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as MOE/4:16-cv-01944
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edmondson , Larry Barnes , Laura Tockman and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
