Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Juan Perez-Barrera v. William Barr
as 19-72581
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL PEREZ-BARRERA, AKA Juan M. Perez
Perez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02560
Plaintiff:
Clarita C. Perez and Juan M. Perez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Counsel #199894 v. Millette et al
as 2:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Mark Counsel #199894
Defendant:
Michael P. Millette, Juan M. Perez, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 2:2013cv00318
Petitioner:
JUAN M. PEREZ
Respondent:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Perez et al
as 1:2012cv01781
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Juan M Perez and Maria D Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2012cv00251
Petitioner:
JUAN M. PEREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos-Hernandez v. Popular, Inc. et al.
as 3:2012cv01005
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Ramos-Hernandez
Defendant:
Housing Financing Authority, Popular, Inc., William (I) Miranda-Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Ramos-Hernandez v. Popular, Inc. et al.
as 1:2011cv02785
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Ramos-Hernandez
Defendant:
Housing Financing Authority, Popular, Inc., William (I) Miranda-Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Theodore Connolly v. County of Hudson, et al
as 11-2984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE CONNOLLY
Defendant - Appellee:
HUDSON CTY, ROBERT B. KNAPP and JUAN M. PEREZ
Alexander Zeno v. US
as 10-1056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER ZENO and MELANIE RIVERA-RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSE A. FUSTE, DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
