Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Conner v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv00047
Defendant:
The City of Kingston Oklahoma, Marshall County Sheriff's Department Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M Conner, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duffy v. Wallace
as 17-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Duffy, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Jack Wallace, Parole Officer II, Individual Capacity, Official Capacity, Stephen Noto, Parole Manager, Individual Capacity, Official Capacity and Beverly Smith, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, Individual Capacity, Official Capacity
Duffy v. Wallace et al
as 3:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duffy, Jr.
Defendant:
Jack Wallace, Stephen Noto and Beverly Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Highsmith et al
as 6:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Erick Paul Wyatt
Defendant:
Robert Highsmith, Jack Wallace Coppedge, II and Lauren Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. General Motors LLC et al
as NYN/1:15-cv-00240
Plaintiff:
Gladys Perez
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , General Motors Holding, LLC , Delphi Automotive PLC and others
Perez v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Gladys Perez
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, General Motors Holding, LLC, Delphi Automotive PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv03276
Plaintiff:
Jack Wallace
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv02290
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden, Octavius Wilfork, Christopher Powers and others
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Hamett et al
as 6:2010cv01668
Plaintiff:
Jack Wallace
Defendant:
Raheem Hamett and C Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Riggs et al
as 2:2010cv01305
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Riggs and Jack Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
