Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Jamal Tait aka Jamal Johnson
as 14-1738
Petitioner:
In re: JAMAL TAIT, AKA Jamal Johnson
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
US v. Antwane Johnson
as 14-6362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTWANE JAMALE JOHNSON
JOHNSON v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv00214
Petitioner:
JAMAL JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Clayton Stewart
as 13-50377
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLAYTON STEWART, AKA Douglas Blackburn, AKA Tyrone Edwards, AKA Bryan Fell, AKA Toni Hannah, AKA David Hanson, AKA Michael James, AKA Lee Jamal Johnson, AKA Dexter Jones, AKA East Keylo, AKA Frank Lance, AKA James Lawrence, AKA Kyle McLinden, AKA Manuel N
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2013cv02349
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JAMAL JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, HOUSE OF CORRECTION, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson and Tarik Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. USA
as 7:2012cv00001
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antwane Jamale Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Kunz et al
as 3:2011cv02432
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson
Defendant:
CO. Kunz, Michael Smith, Capt. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Dunbar v. James Mett
as 11-6716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE DUNBAR
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. MACK, LLOYD BENNETT, TERENCE HAYES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES METTS, in charge of Lexington County Detention Center and CITY COUNCIL, or Person Oursee of the Courts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
