Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Frank Byrne, Jr. v. Berks County Jail System, et al
as 24-1193
Plaintiff:
FRANK JAMES BYRNE, JR.
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, C/O NEIF, B.C.J.S PRIME CARE and others
BYRNE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2023cv05066
Plaintiff:
FRANK JAMES BYRNE, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFREY SMITH, BERKS COUNTY JAIL FOOD DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LT. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wholey v. Bradley, et al
as 23-2076
Petitioner:
JOHN F. WHOLEY, JR.
Respondent:
HONORABLE JUDGE HEATHER BRADLEY, Hingham District Court, JUDGE JAMES BYRNE, Hingham District Court, CLERK MAGISTRATE PAUL FULLAM, Hingham District Court and others
Wholey et al v. Bradley et al
as 1:2023cv12566
Plaintiff:
John F Wholey, Jr.
Defendant:
James Keefe, Honorable Judge Heather Bradley, Judge James Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Tod Martin, Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Tammie Mosely and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lavell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Heap et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, Governor Brian Kemp, Attorney Michael Schiavone and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar Muhammad Ali Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
James Siegfried v. Ellen Kirschbaum, et al
as 17-17193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BYRN SIEGFRIED
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN KIRSCHBAUM, SANDRA LINES, BRIAN LIVINGSTON and others
Siegfried v. Kirschbaum et al
as 2:2016cv03910
Plaintiff:
James Byrn Siegfried
Defendant:
Ellen Kirschbaum, Sandra Lines, Brian L Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Floyd County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 4:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
Wayne Douglas Strickland
Defendant:
Floyd County Sheriff Dept., Ricky Agan, Matthew Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
