Cases 41 - 50 of 55
JOHNSON v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 2:2010cv00551
Petitioner:
JAMES E. JOHNSON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 4:2010cv00306
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff:
James E. Johnson , Jack Tulloch , Nancy Mabery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv01970
Plaintiff:
James E. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Zimmer, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
James E Johnson
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Love v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth N Love
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., Werner Enterprises, Inc., James E Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
James E. Johnson v. National Service Industries, Inc, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-83773
Plaintiff:
James E. Johnson
Defendant:
National Service Industries, Inc
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83773
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65033
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. JOHNSON and JAMES E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Johnson et al v. Michaels of Oregon Company et al
as 1:2007cv00291
Plaintiff:
James E. Johnson and Theresa Johnson
Defendant:
Michaels of Oregon Company, Bushnell Holdings, Inc. and Bushnell Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
