Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Pizzo v. Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv14079
Plaintiff:
James Frank Pizzo
Defendant:
Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Mark Pizzo
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
James Frank Pizzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samuel Love v. James Frank Watson et al
as 2:2018cv00850
Defendant:
Does and James Frank Watson
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Sevilla et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramon Sevilla and Claudia Sevilla
Defendant:
FCA US LLC , James Frank Deckard, Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS V. SPROUL
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANK HARRIS
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Johanne
as 17-50214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES FRANK JOHANNES, also known as James F. Johannes
Franks v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2017cv20068
Plaintiff:
James Franks
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FRANKS v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2016cv05565
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKS
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, SETH WILLIAMS and LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher James Frank v. Debbie Asuncion
as 5:2016cv00278
Respondent:
Debbie Asuncion
Petitioner:
Christopher James Frank
Taylor et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rickey T Taylor, De'Marion D Robinson, Julius Johnson and others
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Marshall Dale Reed, Gaylon D Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
