Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Chaney v. USA et al
as 3:2018cv02019
Defendant:
Donald Trump and USA
Plaintiff:
Carla Denise Chaney
Petitioner:
Joshua James Johnson and Christopher Juan Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wells Fargo, et al.
as 4:2018cv02231
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo and Ten-X, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Filing Error
as 4:2018cv02230
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Borkowski et al v. Baltimore County, Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv02809
Defendant:
Krystin Richardson, Lane Montgomery, Scott D. Shellenberger and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Borkowski, Katelyn Frank, Kaila Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore et al v. City of Cleveland
as 1:2018cv01849
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perstin, Anthony Burdette, James Johnson and others
Defendant:
City of Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COHEN-JOHNSON et al v. MALATESTA et al
as 3:2017cv05773
Plaintiff:
HELENA COHEN-JOHNSON and JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
TONY MALATESTA , ANTHONY FANATASIA , WALTER AKSTULEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandberg v. Englewood, Colorado, et al
as 17-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESTIN SANDBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, a municipality, DUGAN S. COMER, individual and in his official capacity as Englewood City Attorney, TOM SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity and others
Flores v. County of Benton, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05063
Plaintiff:
Adrian Michael Flores
Defendant:
County of Benton, Arkansas, Shawn Holloway, James Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
