Cases 31 - 40 of 43
James Morrow, et al v. City of Tenaha, et al
as 11-90039
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JAMES MORROW, STEPHEN STUART WATSON, AMANEE BUSBY and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
BARRY WASHINGTON, City of Tenaha Deputy City Marshal, Individually and in His Official Capacity, GEORGE BOWERS, City of Tenaha Mayor, Individually and in His Official Capacity, LINDA K. RUSSELL, Shelby County District Attorney, Individually and in Her Official Capacity and others
Smiley v. Hodge et al
as 1:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
Reuben Hodge, Toni Miller, James Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01991
Plaintiff:
Kelly J Morrow , James Morrow , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffery Nichols v. James Morrow
as 11-5413
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY S. NICHOLS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES MORROW, Warden
US v. James Collins, Jr.
as 10-4882
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MORROW COLLINS, JR.
Joseph Dyer, III v. James Morrow
as 10-5137
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. DYER, III
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES MORROW
Dyer v. Bowlen
as 1:2001cv00392
Petitioner:
Joseph P Dyer, III
Defendant:
James Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Morrow et al
as 1:2009cv00183
Petitioner:
Jeffery S Nichols
Respondent:
James Morrow and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrow v. Capitol Plumbing & Air, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00380
Plaintiff:
James Morrow
Defendant:
Capitol Plumbing & Air, Inc. and Jeffrey Werline
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morrow v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11706
Plaintiff:
James Morrow, Jr.
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Parke-Davis, Warner-Lambert Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
