Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Conway County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
James Reid
Defendant:
Conway County Detention Center and Darrell Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Reid v. USA
as 22-5779
Petitioner / Appellant:
CALVIN JAMES REID
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Calvin Reid v. USA
as 22-5595
Petitioner / Appellant:
CALVIN JAMES REID
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reid v. Bureau of Prisons Employee's et al
as 1:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Calvin James Reid
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Employee's, S. Hoey, Care Provider CDR Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Calvin James Reid v. Bureau of Prisons Employees et al
as 5:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Calvin James Reid
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Employees, J. Vargas, M. Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02732
Petitioner:
Calvin James Reid
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donoghue v. Newcombe et al
as 1:2020cv02736
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mark Lilly, President Jimmy Carter Library and others
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Donoghue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Reid v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02508
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Calvin James Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reid v. Davis
as 6:2017cv00249
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
