Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ross v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00045
Petitioner: James Ryan Ross
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheffield v. Food Service Director et al
as 3:2023cv01051
Plaintiff: Andre L. Sheffield
Defendant: Food Service Director, Colonel Handley, Captain Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Walker et al
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff: James Ryan
Defendant: Officer Walker and Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Walker et al
as 7:2023cv00186
Plaintiff: James Ryan
Defendant: Ms. Walker and Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Lopez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00473
Defendant: Jacob L. Harrison, Richard Saldivar, Davonte Head and others
Plaintiff: James Ryan Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloom v. Schmidt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03260
Respondent: Derek Schmidt
Petitioner: James Ryan Bloom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodgers v. Does We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00840
Plaintiff: James Ryan Rodgers
Defendant: Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill-El v. Scrivener et al
as 8:2018cv03643
Defendant: Ronald A. Gottlieb, James Airey, Judge Robert A. Greenbery and others
Plaintiff: Antoine Martwain Hill-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyd v. Chillicothe Correctional Institute We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01003
Plaintiff: James Ryan Boyd
Defendant: Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burruel v. USA
as 2:2017cv02892
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Ryan Burruel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?