Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Saunders v. Albertsons/Safeway, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Saunders
Defendant:
Albertsons/Safeway, LLC. and United Food and Commerical Workers Union, Local #7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dennis v. Drehmel et al
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Dennis
Defendant:
CO Drehmel, CO Maitland, Sgt Kroontz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Booth, Jamie v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Booth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bledsoe v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2023cv00822
Petitioner:
Jamie Lee Bledsoe
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Harrison Co. 71st Judicial Court, Sixth Court of Appeal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Lee
as 4:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Rodney Logan, Jr.
Defendant:
Jamie Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Andrews et al v. Autoliv Japan, Ltd.
as 1:2014cv03432
Special Master:
Michael A. Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Andrews
Defendant:
Mazda Motor Corporation, Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
RUSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21088
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LEE RUSH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AMADOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20919
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LEE AMADOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
