Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Baram v. Doe
as 24-599
Plaintiff: JONATHAN BARAM, an individual
Defendant: JANE DOE, an individual, DICELLO LEVITT, fka DiCello Levitt Gutzler a law firm, THE HABA LAW FIRM P.A., a law firm and others
Penner v. Gaines County
as 23-10985
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cheryl Penner, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Brian Gandy, as next friend KG, LG, RG, and ZG, minor children and Megan Tate Gandy
Defendant / Appellee: Gaines County, Texas, Jeffery James, Individually, Calvin Sellers, Individually and others
Smith v. Town of Chino Valley, et al.
as 23-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: TOWN OF CHINO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, CHINO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation incorporated in the State of Arizona, UNKNOWN BROWN, named as RO Brown (CV21), individaully and as husband and others
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Doe
as 23-939
Petitioner: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Respondent: Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1563
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul Boyne v. Michael Sponheimer
as 23-1549
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. BOYNE
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL SPONHEIMER, in individual and official capacity as state trooper, SAMANTHA MCCORD, in individual and official capacity as state trooper and JANE DOE, in individual and official capacity as state trooper
Stepanishen v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv00421
Plaintiff: Steven Stepanishen
Defendant: Marcus Baker, Does 1-3, Individually and Official Capacity and Does John Doe 1-2, Jane Doe 1, Individually and Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
CRST Expedited, Inc. v. USDC-CARIV
as 23-70065
Not Classified By Court: In re: CRST EXPEDITED, INC., an entity of unknown form and JANE DOE, an individual
Petitioner: CRST EXPEDITED, INC., an entity of unknown form
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Jane Doe, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55133
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE, an individual and JOHN DOE, No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, individuals
Defendant / Appellee: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and DOES, 1-25, inclusive

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?