Cases 1 - 10 of 283
Sanderson v. Myrdal
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Janne Myrdal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jann Aponte Rivera
as 24-3024
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jann Jousten Aponte Rivera, also known as Jann, also known as Menor
Sanderson v. Myrdal
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Janne Myrdal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Curto v. Erie County Water Authority
as 24-29
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA J. CURTO
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY and EARL L. JANN, JR.
Maier et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Maier and Janne Maier
Defendant:
Buck Jones, Jerrod Towne, Thomas Berberich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Linn v. Jonnett Product Enterprises et al
as 3:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Montreal Linn
Defendant:
Jonnett Product Enterprises, Lakeside Community Committee, Michael D Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Chapa v. Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors et al
as 2:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Chapa
Defendant:
Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors, Levy, Erlanger & Company LLP, Lyon Real Estate Natomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapa v. Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Chapa
Defendant:
Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors, Levy, Erlanger & Company LLP, Lyon Real Estate Natomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14570
Plaintiff:
JANN HER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
