Cases 1 - 10 of 54
United States v. Glass
as 26-5098
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JASON DEWAYNE GLASS, AKA Jason Patrick Gleason, AKA Justin Lee Matthews
Smith v. Evans et al
as 6:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
David Evans, Jason Patrick, Rodney B. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aldrich et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11833
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc., Mine Respirator Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Aldrich, Tremaine Alexander, Gary Raymond Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pitts et al v. The Hiller Companies LLC
as 5:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Misty Adams Pitts and Jason Patrick Pitts
Defendant:
The Hiller Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Spriggs v. Graham et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Patrick Spriggs
Defendant:
Corey Graham and Lutheran Kosciusko Hospital
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayman v. Zarzaur et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Robert Sayman
Defendant:
Jason Patrick Zarzaur, Michael Corbat, Equifax Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MORNINGSTAR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20500
Plaintiff:
JASON PATRICK MORNINGSTAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLIFF v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11097
Plaintiff:
JASON PATRICK CLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Odom v. Metro Nashville Gov't et al
as 3:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jason Patrick Odom
Defendant:
Metro Nashville Gov't, Davidson County, City of Berry Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jason Baca
as 22-1274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Patrick Baca
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.