Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wynn v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wynn
Defendant:
Jay Davis and Jay Davis Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swami Family Trust Dated February 22, 2024 et al v. Mathow et al
as 6:2026cv01610
Plaintiff:
Swami Family Trust Dated February 22, 2024, Ravi Patel, 1070 Hospitality Inc and others
Defendant:
Sandeep Mathow, Kismet Business Trust LLC, Kismet Family Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05800
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026at02925
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chung et al v. King
as 1:2026cv04186
Plaintiff:
Dae Kun Chung and Lina Kim
Defendant:
Jay Corey King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Rebardo v. Underground Electric Construction Co.
as 2:2026cv02554
Plaintiff:
Randall Jay Rebardo
Defendant:
Underground Electric Construction Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Orost v. Gerhard
as 2:2026cv00248
Plaintiff:
Jay Orost
Defendant:
Alina Gerhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOMACK et al v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2026cv05107
Plaintiff:
JAY WOMACK and HEATHER WOMACK
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
