Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Corazon De Cristo Cano, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-56094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO, TERRY HARDIN, CRYSTAL IRVIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
McCoy v. Circuit Court of Madison County, TN et al
as 1:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Div. III Circuit Court of Madison County, TN and Circuit Judge Kyle C. Atkins
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amaker v. Annucci
as 17-1807
Plaintiff:
Batise D. Amaker and Grace D. Amaker
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jeffrey McCoy, William A. Lee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02540
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Annucci et al
as 1:2015cv03754
Plaintiff:
James K. Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jeffrey McCoy, William Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaker et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2014cv09692
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker, Batise D. Amaker and Grace D. Amaker
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jeffrey McCoy, William A. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. USA - 2255
as 8:2013cv02625
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McCoy
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fire Insurance Exchange v. McCoy et al
as 2:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Fire Insurance Exchange and Fire Insurance Exchange
Defendant:
Jeffrey McCoy, Lisa Bledsoe and J. J.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
